To accomplish this:
Given these challenges, I don’t believe this request can realistically be implemented in the near future (e.g., within the next five years).
Generally speaking, I would suggest that my customer address this issue using the following method:
Let’s take an example: Suppose there is an item that can be sold both in EA (each) and BX (boxes). In this case, these should be set up as two separate items with similar item numbers and descriptions, so they can be easily located side by side in F7 and F8 searches. The EA item should be set up with its EA UPC code, while the BX item should use the GTIN (14-digit code) as its UPC.
If the BX item is broken up, there should be a conversion process to convert the BX item to the EA item and vice versa. This can be achieved by creating a BOMP work order (WO). The warehouse can handle this conversion using the work order process.
From a stock status inquiry perspective, this setup allows visibility of the quantity for both the BX item and the broken box EA item. Rather than relying on a price table with quantity breaks, a better approach would be to establish different unit prices for EA and BX to incentivize customers to purchase in BX.